On This Page
Who is Completing the Application?
Please provide contact information for the person who will complete the online application for this project. The email address and password entered here will be used to complete and submit both Pre-Applications and Applications.
Lisa Kocich-Meyer
Director of Planning
281-275-2311
Primary Agency Information
Please provide contact information for the agency official who is representing the project sponsor. This individual will be considered the official applicant and must be authorized by their agency to submit this request for funding and make necessary assertations and representations on the agency’s behalf.
2700 Town Center Blvd North
Sugar Land
TX
77479
Additional Agency Information
301 Jackson Street, Suite 401
Richmond
TX
77469
Project Information
Williams Trace Blvd Reconstruction
Fort Bend County
Williams Trace Blvd
From SH6 to Lexington Blvd
The project is to address issues with capacity deficiency and improve mobility. Additional left turn lanes are needed to improve the queuing for turning movements at several intersections; Edgewater NB/SB, Highland Dr. NB/SB, Lexington Blvd NB/SB.
Reconstruct the existing 4-lane divided boulevard roadway including curb and gutter. Construct additional lanes near SH 6 and Lexington. Construct 2200 linear feet of left turn lanes at various locations. Replace inlets and manholes.
Improved mobility; Increased capacity for thru movements and left turn lanes; and Improved the drainage system.
I Don't Know
I Don't Know
Less than $100 million
(Expand) Roadway Added Capacity/New Construction/Complete Streets
5440000
Letter of Funding Commitment - P5 - Williams Trace Reconstruction.pdf
Project Development/Readiness
Not Started
None of the Above
10/31/2023
No
No
No
Yes
Yes
10/01/2020
01/04/2021
09/06/2021
A total of 32,000 SFT
None
No
No
Benefit/Cost Analysis
P5 - BCA_Safety Benefits - Roadway.xlsx
P5 - BCA_Emissions Benefits - Roadway.xlsx
Supporting Documents - Volume Report and Growth Rate - Williams Trace.zip
BCA Methodology Justification - Williams Trace.docx
The methodology to calculate the BCA for Safety, Emissions and Delay was based on the Templates provided by H-GAC. The input data was obtained by the H-GAC travel demand model - using yearly growth rate correction when necessary (the detailed explanation can be found in the Word file, named "BCA Methodology Justification"). Based on the performance improvement resulted from similar projects (additional left-turn lane to better direct traffic and make signal timing allocation more efficient), we considered a conservative 3 mph improvement as the expected "average speed after improvement". In addition, the information related to 2018 traffic volume was obtained using the data collected by magnetometers installed in some signalized intersections along the roadway of interest. In order to obtain the typical weekday ADT we averaged the 24h volume reports from Oct 22-26 (Monday through Friday) for each location. We then chose to use the highest Weekday Average ADT since this location would represent the heaviest segment within the roadway. The results show Benefits of $10,550,000 (Delay); $2,697 (Emissions); and $3,133,000 (Safety), in 2018 dollars; totalling $13,3682,697. The Cost is represented by the amount of federal funds requested; $5,425,920. Which results in a Benefit/Cost ratio of 2.52 - meeting the requirement for BCA > 1.0
Planning Factors - Connectivity to Employment/Eliminates At-Grade Railroad Crossings
Yes
901 - 1000
No
Planning Factors - Environmental Justice
Yes
Yes
Planning Factors - Improves Corridor Level of Travel Time Reliability (LOTTR)
0.11 - 0.20
Planning Factors - Improves Multimodal LOS
No
No
Yes
This project will provide added capacity to ped/bike, replacing the existing 4 ft sidewalk with a 10ft sidepath. This enhancement also improves the connectivity of the ped/bike network.
Planning Factors - Planning Coordination
Yes
Major Thoroughfare Master Plan
https://www.sugarlandtx.gov/DocumentCenter/View/664
Planning Factors - Roadway Hierarchy/Freight System Priority/Evacuation Route
Minor Arterial
No
No
No
Yes