Transportation Project Questionnaire

Operational Improvements and Congestion Management Questionnaire

Project Information

Agency Name	TxDOT Beaumont District
Project Title	FM 1960 Widening
Facility/Street/Highway	FM 1960
Limits	From SH 321 to SH 99
Description	Widen from 2 to 4 lanes
Timeframe	Short Term (0-5 Years)
Estimated Cost	$27,500,000.00

Investment Category-Focused Criteria

1. Is the project located on a facility listed on Texas 100 most congested roads list?

No

1b. If no, please provide the existing peak period travel time index (TTI) of the facility where proposed project is located.

1.0 – 1.25

1b-i. Provide a narrative describing the existing congestion where proposed project is located and describe narrative to explain methodology to calculate existing TTI.

Travel Time Index (TTI) is a ratio that compares peak period travel times along a corridor to average travel times, thus estimating a relative level of rush hour congestion. Current TTI for the project area is between1.00-1.25, indicating that it takes 1.00 to 1.25 times as long to travel this corridor in the peak period than average, which is mildly congested. Existing congestion along FM 1960 comes from traffic coming from and to the city of Dayton and SH 99. Approximately 1/3 of trips on FM 1960 take place during the PM Peak and 1/4 during the AM Peak. This indicates heavy commuter traffic which creates congestion and decreases traffic operations.

2. What is the estimated TTI after project is implemented?

< 1.0

2a. Provide a narrative describing the existing congestion where proposed project is located. Within the narrative explain the methodology and data used to calculate existing Travel Time Index (TTI).

Travel Time Index (TTI) is a ratio that compares peak period travel times along a corridor to average travel times, thus estimating a relative level of rush hour congestion. Existing congestion along FM 1960 comes from traffic coming from and to the city of Dayton and SH 99. Approximately 1/3 of trips on FM 1960 take place during the PM Peak and 1/4 during the AM Peak. This indicates heavy commuter traffic which creates congestion and decreases traffic operations.

3. Please provide a narrative to describe congestion management strategies and improvements (work types) proposed to reduce congestion on facility where the proposed project is located.

The project will be reconstructing and widening from 2 to 4 lanes (adding 2 through lanes and installing continuous turn lane) while also constructing Safety improvements (install pavement markings, resurfacing). The segment will be brought up to TxDOT and FHWA safety design standards. The proposed design would include edge line rumble strips or profile pavement markings.

4. Is the proposed project located on a facility identified as a hurricane evacuation route in any regional or local plans?

No

4a. If no, is the proposed project located on a facility that functions as an alternative to an evacuation route?

Yes

4a-i. If yes, explain.

FM 1960 ties to SH 321 and SH 99 directly and to SH 146 indirectly - these are all designated evacuation routes. FM 1960 provides connectivity between these evacuation routes.

Other Investment Category Focused Criteria

1. Was the project scored under Regional Goods Movement Category?

Yes

2. Please provide a narrative explaining how the proposed project benefits high growth areas. Within the narrative, please explain if the proposed project improves or provides access to new residential developments, retail stores, other land uses, or if the proposed project alleviates future congestion due to potential economic development activity such as expansion of warehouses or other freight generators.

The Dayton area continues to grow, with industrial and residential developments currently planned on the west side of town. The additional lanes provided by this project will help alleviate the increase of traffic and maintain a high level-of-service as the area grows. The turn lanes included with the project will maintain safe access to businesses and residences along the route.

3. Please provide a narrative explaining how the proposed project improves walking and biking conditions. Within the narrative, please explain if the proposed project scope includes construction of a new or improved existing bicycle and pedestrian infrastructure on a project facility or in the vicinity of the project.

Pedestrian and bike accommodations will be included in accordance with TxDOT's Roadway Design Manual. This would include sidewalks at a minimum as well as 10'-minimum width shoulders.

4. Please provide a narrative explaining how the proposed project improves traffic conditions for transit services (local, express, signature, or commuter).

Brazos Transit's route in Dayton includes a segment of FM 1960 within this project's limits. The additional capacity provided by this project will improve the level-of-service on FM 1960 (reducing congestion) and should improve safety. This will directly benefit all roadway users including those using this transit service.

5. Please provide a narrative explaining how the proposed project will reduce inoperability for significant periods due to infrastructure damaged by a collision with vehicles such as trucks, ships, and barges.

The proposed project will reduce inoperability from vehicular crashes or potential storm damage by providing additional lanes of travel. The proposed facility will be less prone to complete closure because of the added capacity. The increased capacity should also help reduce the number of accidents and improve the response time of emergency responders.

6. Please provide a narrative explaining how the proposed project will improve state of good repair and extend the service life of the project facility.

This project will improve the state of good repair and extend and improve the service life and resiliency of the facility by adding newly constructed sections and reevaluating any existing pavement that may remain to bring it up to the current standards. The pavement design for the new sections and any existing sections will be based on the latest traffic data and design standards. The drainage facilities for the project will be designed to meet or exceed ATLAS-14 standards. With this newly constructed / reconstructed section minimal maintenance work should be required for several decades.

Planning Factors Criteria

1. What is the existing fatality crash rate at the project location? Regional crash data is available online on the crash data viewer. H-GAC staff will provide assistance in calculating the crash rates upon request.

3.533

2. What is the existing serious injury crash rate at the project location? Regional crash data is available online on the crash data viewer. H-GAC staff will provide assistance in calculating the crash rates upon request.

15.899

3. Please provide a narrative explaining how the proposed project reduces expected fatality and serious injury crashes. Narrative must include specific improvements (work types) included in the project scope. Crash reduction factors associated with specific work types can be found in the safety benefits calculation template. H-GAC staff can provide assistance in gathering the crash reduction factors upon request.

The proposed project reduces expected fatality and serious injury crashes by building to current design standards with 12' travel lanes and 10' outside shoulders and a 14' - 16' center left turn lane. The proposed design would include additional through lanes, a continuous turn lane, and edge line rumble strips or profile pavement markings as appropriate.

Resiliency

1. Please select the vulnerability to flooding score at the project location based on the Regional Resiliency tool. H-GAC staff can provide assistance with the regional resiliency tool upon request.

Low

2. Please select the criticality score at the project location based on the Regional Resiliency tool. H-GAC staff can provide assistance with the regional resiliency tool up on request.

Low

3. Please provide a narrative explaining how the proposed project reduces vulnerability to flooding. The narrative must include specific improvements such as drainage improvements that are included in the scope.

The proposed project would reduce the vulnerability to flooding as it would be built to current hydrologic and hydraulic design standards. It would be designed to meet or exceed ATLAS-14 drainage standards. Specific improvements may include additional cross drainage capacity and possibly raising the proposed roadway profile if determined necessary by the hydraulic analysis.

Access/Connectivity

Please enter the household population located within a quarter mile buffer of the project location: 1a. Low-Income

2670

1b. Hispanic and Non-Hispanic Minorities

5161

2. Does the proposed project improve or provide new connectivity to a medical facility within a quarter mile buffer of the project location?

No

3. Does the proposed project improve or provide new connectivity to a school/college/university within a quarter mile buffer of the project location?

No

4. Does the proposed project improve or provide new connectivity to a social services facility within a quarter buffer of the project location?

No

Environmental Justice

Please enter household population located within quarter mile buffer of the project location. H-GAC staff can assist in gathering the data. 1a. Low-Income

2670

1b. Hispanic and Non-Hispanic Minorities

5161

1c. Household Population Under Poverty

1173

1d. Disabled Persons

856

1e. Elderly Persons

331

1f. Limited English Proficiency

739

2. What is the average Livable Center Need Index within quarter mile buffer of the project location? H-GAC staff can assist in gathering the data.

21.2

3. Please provide a narrative explaining how the proposed project provides benefits to vulnerable populations. Benefits include safety improvements, construction of or improvements to ped/bike facilities, or improvements to transit stops.

By adding capacity, the proposed project should reduce traffic congestion and help minimize travel delays. This added capacity project should improve connectivity to and from the employment opportunities along this corridor. The additional through lanes and center turn lane should help improve safety along this stretch of roadway. The project would provide accommodations for pedestrian and bike traffic in accordance with TxDOT's Roadway Design Manual as needed. Widening the facility, adding a center turn lane, and including 10' shoulders will provide a safety benefit to employees entering and exiting the roadway from businesses along the corridor. Providing full shoulders will provide a safer bicycling area within corridor.

4. Please provide a narrative explaining how the proposed project avoids or mitigates adverse effects to vulnerable populations. A list of adverse effects was provided in detailed criteria document.

The footprint of the proposed roadway improvements would be minimized to help prevent impacts to adjacent properties, thus reducing any possible displacements of persons, businesses, etc. The current roadway usage would not change with the proposed construction project. The addition of through lanes would maintain access to adjacent properties including public and private facilities and services with less impact to the flow of traffic than currently occurs. Any sound walls that are identified prior/during the National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA) process will be constructed on this project.

Impacts on Natural and Cultural Resources

1. Please provide a narrative explaining how the proposed project avoids or mitigates impacts to natural (flood plains, wetlands) and cultural (historic and archeological sites) resources. H-GAC staff can provide assistance in identifying natural and cultural resources located within a quarter mile buffer of the project location.

Floodplains present in the project vicinity include the 100 year, 500 year, and a floodway. In addition, some wetlands are present. During project development, wetland information is provided to the design team to determine where the project might impact Waters of the U.S. (WOUS). The design is adjusted if possible to avoid and minimize impacts to WOUS. Any unavoidable impacts are mitigated through USACE approved mitigation banks. With regard to the floodplains present, the project would be designed to have no negative impact to the floodplain and we would coordinate with the floodplain administrator concerning these.

2. Please provide Nitrogen Oxides (NOx) and Volatile Organic Compounds (VOC) reductions provided by the project. H-GAC staff can provide assistance in calculating NOx and VOC reductions.
(Optional)

NOx - .69 Tons VOC - .91 tons

Innovation

1. Does the project propose to implement new infrastructure technologies to enhance accessibility, mobility, multimodalism, resiliency, reliability, or traffic operations?

No

2. Does the project propose to implement new autonomous/connected vehicle technology?

No

Additional Documents