Transportation Project Questionnaire

Major Projects Questionnaire

Project Information

Agency Name	TxDOT Houston District
Project Title	IH 45 N Improvements based on IH 45 N PEL Study
Facility/Street/Highway	IH 45 N
Limits	From SL 8 to SH 99
Description	RECONSTRUCT AND WIDEN FROM 8 TO 12 LANE (ADD 4 MANAGED LANES) - Safety, operational and mobility improvements to IH 45 N mainlanes and frontage roads, based on results of the IH 45 North Freeway PEL study
Timeframe	Medium Term (6-10 Years)
Estimated Cost	$200,000,000.00

Regional Transportation Plan Goals

1. Please provide narrative describing how the proposed project supports all goals established in the Regional Transportation Plan (2045 RTP).

According to the 2045 RTP, this project falls under H-GAC’s Manage, Maintain, and Expand strategies, which collectively directly support all five of H-GAC’s goals of improving safety, achieving/maintaining a state of good repair, moving people and goods efficiently, strengthening regional economic competitiveness, and protecting cultural and natural resources. [1] Improve Safety: This project will provide additional capacity to the roadway and reduce primary and secondary crashes caused by congestion. [2] Achieve & Maintain State of Good Repair: In a widening/reconstruction project, old pavement is removed, and new pavement is constructed, thus increasing the state of good repair. [3] Move People and Goods Reliably and Efficiently: This project will reduce congestion and reduce resulting crashes, increasing the reliability of the facility. [4] Strengthen Regional Economic Competitiveness: This project will reduce congestion and resulting crashes, increasing the truck travel time reliability of the facility, boosting regional and economic competitiveness. [5] Conserve and Protect Natural and Cultural Resources: This project will include improved drainage, which will benefit the natural resources abutting the facility. This project will reduce emissions caused by idling and congestion.

Regional Significance

1. Is the project a Roadway Project or a Transit Project?

Roadway

1a. For Roadway projects, this project is located on a facility functionally classified as a:

Principal Arterial or Higher Functional Class

Potential Crash Reductions

1. What is the existing fatality crash rate at the project location? Regional crash data is available online at crash data viewer. H-GAC staff will provide assistance in calculating the crash rates upon request.

1.871

2. What is the existing serious injury crash rate at the project location? Regional crash data is available online at crash data viewer. H-GAC staff will provide assistance in calculating the crash rates upon request.

4.9

3. Please provide a narrative explaining how the proposed project reduces expected fatality and serious injury crashes. Narrative must include specific improvements (work types) included in the project scope. Crash reduction factors associated with specific work types can be found in the safety benefits calculation template. H-GAC staff can provide assistance in gathering the crash reduction factors upon request.

Crash rates for this segment are per 100 million VMT. The fatality rate is 1.871, higher than the regional average (1.23), and the serious injury rate is 5.125, lower than the regional average, (6.18). The reconstruction and widening of the roadway will provide additional capacity to the roadway and reduce primary and secondary crashes caused by congestion. Managed lanes are vital for reducing congestion and offering drivers more reliable timeframes for getting to their destinations, adjusting lane strategies as needed to maximize roadway efficiency, and improving traffic flow on both the managed and general-purpose lanes. According to the IH 45 N PEL Study, frontage roads will be equipped with sidewalks or shared-use paths. The addition of pedestrian infrastructure will allow pedestrians to safely use the facility and reduce points of conflict with vehicles, thus improving the overall safety of the segment. The consolidated crash reduction factor for this project is 93%, as a result of installing sidewalks (WC 407) and providing additional travel lanes (WC 517).

Potential Congestion Reductions

1. Is the project located on a facility listed on Texas 100 most congested roads list?

Yes

1a. If yes, please provide link to the list.

Rank #86 and #81, https://www.txdot.gov/apps/statewide_mapping/StatewidePlanningMap.html (Top 100 Layer)

2. Please provide a narrative explaining how the proposed project reduces congestion. Narrative must include specific improvements (work types) included in the project scope.

The recommended alternatives include constructing 4 elevated managed lanes (WC 517) along the IH 45 N corridor. Access to the managed lanes would be provided through slip ramps from the mainlanes and/or frontage roads, multimodal hubs, or a combination of slip ramps and multimodal hubs. Access would be limited to 5 or 6 locations along the 24-mile corridor. Limited access will provide better operations and improve safety by reducing the number of conflict points and merging traffic. The traffic analysis looked at four different criteria to determine how the recommended alternatives would improve mobility and reduce congestion along the corridor. The four criteria include: travel time in minutes, level of service, travel time reliability index, and daily person trips. The recommended alternatives also include improvements that will improve traffic operations along the frontage roads. An operational analysis was completed at 17 frontage road intersections along the corridor and each intersection is expected to operate at LOS F in the year 2045. There are 10 frontage road intersections from Beltway 8N to SH 99 with recommended improvements that are expected to improve traffic operations to LOS D or better. Beltway 8N: Grade separate through lanes, Greens Road: Add turn lanes (WC 519 & 521), Rankin Road: Optimize traffic signals, Airtex Drive: Add through lanes (WC 517), Richey Road: convert to diverging diamond interchange (WC 515), FM 1960: Add acceleration lanes, Hollow Tree Lane / Parramatta Lane: Construct turbo roundabouts (WC 547) at frontage road intersections, Cypresswood Drive: Add turn lanes (WC 519 & 521) and add through lanes (WC 517) along Cypresswood Drive, Louetta Road: Construct turbo roundabouts (WC 547) at frontage road intersections, and FM 2920: convert to diverging diamond interchange (WC 515). The segment will be brought up to TxDOT and FHWA safety design standards.

Connectivity to Jobs, Medical Facilities, and Activity Centers

1. Does the proposed project improve or provide new connectivity to jobs within a 1/4 mile buffer of the project location?

Yes

1a. Please provide the number of jobs located within 1/4 mile distance of the project.

36,833

2. Does the proposed project improve or provide new connectivity to a medical facility within a 1/4 mile buffer of the project location?

No

3. Does the proposed project improve or provide new connectivity to an activity center within a 1/4 mile buffer of the project location?

Yes

4. Provide narrative describing how proposed project improves or provides new connectivity to jobs, medical facilities, and activity centers.

This segment of IH 45 N will be getting reconstructed and added capacity (additional managed lanes as well) to address congestion. This corridor connects north Houston (Spring/The Woodlands) to Houston (Greenspoint Mall Area) and a few industrial facilities (including Pinto Business Park, Northpark Central (Drive) Business Park, and the ExxonMobil World HQ) that provide thousands of jobs. HCA Houston Healthcare Northwest and St. Luke's Health - Springwoods Village Hospital - Spring, TX hospitals are nearby this IH 45 N corridor.

State of Good Repair

1. What is the age of the facility where proposed project is located?

Pavement less than 30 years, Bridges less than 50 years

2. What is the existing condition of the facility.

Poor

3. Please explain how the project improves state of good repair and extends the service life of the facility.

Segments of the project have pavement in Poor condition, according to TxDOT and FHWA guidelines. This segment contains bridges in Fair condition, according to FHWA guidelines. The worst bridge on this project segment was built in 1997. It is rated as being in Fair condition overall, with a superstructure condition score of 6, substructure condition score of 5, and a deck condition score of 6. In a widening/reconstruction project like this project, pavement is removed and new pavement is constructed, thus increasing the state of good repair and extending the service life of the facility.

Biking and Walking Conditions

1. Please provide a narrative explaining how the proposed project improves walking and biking conditions. Within the narrative, please explain if the proposed project scope includes construction of new or improve existing bicycle and pedestrian infrastructure on project facility or in the vicinity of the project.

The IH 45 N corridor has a number of existing bicycle and pedestrian facilities throughout the study area. While many facilities currently exist, most of the bikeway facilities are disconnected and fail to provide an integrated network for bicycle and pedestrian travel within the study area. This is especially the case surrounding the IH 45 N corridor as very few designated facilities provide access across IH 45 N. Bikeways largely exist only on the fringes of the study area. The recommended alternatives include a continuous shared use path along both the northbound and southbound frontage roads. The continuous shared use paths will provide bicyclists and pedestrians a safe place to travel away from traffic. IH 45 N creates a barrier with limited east-west bicycle and pedestrian crossings. Full reconstruction of the frontage road intersections at Richey Road, Hollow Tree Lane, Cypresswood Drive, and Louetta Road provide the opportunity to add bicycle and pedestrian accommodations along the east-west cross streets. The recommended alternatives include planned bicycle and pedestrian improvements consistent with the H-GAC Active Transportation Plan and Montgomery County Precinct 2 Mobility Study. This includes bicycle and pedestrian improvements along Beltway 8N frontage roads, Green Road, Rankin Road and FM 2920, and new trail crossings at Greens Bayou and Cypress Creek. The bicycle and pedestrian improvements will be updated as needed through the environmental review process and design based on stakeholder input and to be consistent with updated Harris and Montgomery County plans.

Impacts to Vulnerable Populations

1. Please enter the Low-Income household population located within 1/4 buffer of the project location. H-GAC staff can assist in gathering the data.

36,473

2. Please enter the Hispanic and Non-Hispanic Minorities household population located within 1/4 buffer of the project location. H-GAC staff can assist in gathering the data.

39,026

3. Please enter the Household Population Under Poverty located within 1/4 buffer of the project location. H-GAC staff can assist in gathering the data.

10,220

4. Please enter the Disabled Persons household population located within 1/4 buffer of the project location. H-GAC staff can assist in gathering the data.

3,961

5. Please enter the Elderly Persons household population located within 1/4 buffer of the project location. H-GAC staff can assist in gathering the data.

1,191

6. Please enter the Limited English Proficiency household population located within 1/4 buffer of the project location. H-GAC staff can assist in gathering the data.

4,301

7. What is the average Livable Center Need Index within 1/4 buffer of the project location? H-GAC staff can assist in gathering the data.

43.6

8. Please provide a narrative explaining how the proposed project provides benefits to vulnerable populations (benefits include safety improvements, or construction or improvements to ped/bike facilities, or improvements to transit stops.

The area surrounding the project segment has a higher low-income population (20.50%) as compared to the regional average of 13.5%. The area surrounding the project segment has a higher minority population (78.28%) as compared to the regional average of 65% minority. Because of its central location in the regional network, the project will produce improvements in mobility and connectivity for vulnerable populations as well as connectivity to schools, medical facilities, and social services for the regional population. As a result of the improvement, vulnerable populations will have increased resilience and evacuation capacity in the event of hazards. According to HGAC’s Regional Resilience Tool, the project segment sits on a facility that is ranked as high criticality for accessing key facilities. IH 45 N is an evacuation route/runs parallel to an evacuation route/connect to an evacuation route]. The project will improve drainage to ATLAS-14 standards, which reduce flooding events and their impact on vulnerable populations. The project will increase access to and reliability of transit services for vulnerable populations, who generally rely more on these services.

9. Please provide a narrative explaining how the proposed project avoids or mitigates adverse effects to vulnerable populations. List of adverse effects was provided in detailed criteria document.

The area surrounding the project segment has a higher low-income population (20.50%) as compared to the regional average of 13.5%. The area surrounding the project segment has a higher minority population (78.28%) as compared to the regional average of 65% minority. TxDOT’s NEPA Environmental Process is designed to ensure compliance with Title VI of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, and the Executive Order on Environmental Justice. Standard practice is to implement projects that provide user safety and operational efficiency while taking into account environmental quality and impacts to surrounding communities. In practice this means identifying and assessing potential project impacts, then proposing measures to avoid, minimize and/or mitigate disproportionately high and adverse effects to Environmental Justice Populations. For example, the project will improve drainage to ATLAS-14 standards, which will mitigate impacts from added capacity to vulnerable populations. A noise analysis during NEPA will be conducted for a project such as this to determine if sound walls are needed or not.

Hurricane Evacuation Route

1. Is the proposed project located on a facility identified as a hurricane evacuation route in any regional or local plans?

Yes

Additional Documents

2023CFP-186 map.png